Why did CGI get worse? This question has been circulating among movie enthusiasts and critics alike, as the quality of computer-generated imagery (CGI) in recent films has seemed to take a turn for the worse. Despite the advancements in technology and the increasing power of computers, many viewers have noticed a decline in the visual appeal and realism of CGI. In this article, we will explore the reasons behind this phenomenon and discuss the potential consequences for the film industry.
One of the primary reasons for the perceived decline in CGI quality is the overuse of the technology. As more and more films rely on CGI to create their visual effects, the bar for what is considered acceptable has been lowered. Producers and directors often opt for CGI to save time and money, which can lead to a lack of attention to detail and a focus on quantity over quality.
Additionally, the rapid evolution of CGI technology has created a situation where artists and technicians are constantly trying to keep up with the latest trends and techniques. This can result in a race to the bottom, where the emphasis is on showcasing the most advanced technology rather than creating a cohesive and believable world.
Another factor contributing to the decline in CGI quality is the lack of training and experience among some of the artists and technicians working in the field. With the ease of access to powerful software, more individuals are entering the industry without the necessary skills to produce high-quality work. This can lead to a saturation of the market with subpar CGI, further driving down the overall standard.
Furthermore, the pressure to release films on tight schedules can also play a role in the degradation of CGI. When studios face deadlines, they may cut corners in the production process, resulting in rushed and poorly executed CGI. This is particularly evident in the case of sequels and adaptations, where the focus is often on delivering a product quickly rather than crafting a masterpiece.
Despite these challenges, there are still many examples of exceptional CGI work being produced. It is important for the industry to recognize the importance of quality and invest in training and development for artists and technicians. By doing so, the film industry can ensure that CGI remains a tool to enhance storytelling rather than a distraction from it.
In conclusion, the decline in CGI quality can be attributed to a combination of factors, including the overuse of technology, the pressure to keep up with the latest trends, the lack of training and experience, and the pressure to meet tight deadlines. By addressing these issues, the film industry can strive to maintain the high standards of visual storytelling that CGI has the potential to deliver.
